So this is one take on the existence of revenge porn. I like feminists and I'm all for a healthy dialog, but I get really uneasy when something happens that mean the existence of porn is innately bad.
You know how rape isn't sex? Revenge porn isn't porn.
To be sure, this is an extremely alarming website/bullshit cultural misogyny
event-of-the-week. It's evidence that the law needs to keep up with
technology as far as abusive conduct, harassment, and our greater
understanding of consent. And I think it's important to have an
ongoing critique of mainstream porn in terms of its underlying
assumptions & artifices. Still, I disagree with is the idea that
"it isn’t possible to separate ‘revenge porn’ from
‘porn,’" or the assertion that "When women are
objectified, they lose power and men gain power." or: "The male gaze is a
disempowering one." Taking that stance allows for no complexity whatsoever,
and ignores a history of resourceful resistance by women & others
who find ways of working with, making money off of, critiquing, and
directly addressing the male gaze.
The stance taken also polices desire in a
way that ultimately makes me uncomfortable.
Murphy writes: "Just
as revenge porn isn't simply about naked bodies, neither is
mainstream porn. It’s the power dynamic that’s ‘sexy’ and
it’s the degradation that separates both revenge porn and ‘regular’
porn from straight-up nudity and sex." That seems to me a highly
personal interpretation of porn that simply cannot be applied across
the board, and robs all sorts of pervs and gender nonconforming and
otherwise atypical people and sex workers and queers and trans people
of their ability to make their own judgments and decisions about how
they use their bodies.
So... not ultimately
on board. Just as rape isn't about sex, online harassment like this
douchebag's site is not about porn. It's about breaching trust and
consent: it's an extension of harassment and stalking, and should be criminalized. It's about entitlement to women's bodies, which I think
should be resisted on all possible levels. But dragging PORN ITSELF
into it is like blaming death metal or hip hop for youth violence;
there are much bigger, more life-threatening cultural patterns at
play--concepts of masculinity, structural violence, and interlocking
oppressions-- that need to be addressed rather than the mere
existence of adults interacting sexually on camera for money.
Stop doing that.
No comments:
Post a Comment
This is not a forum for the debating of the existence of sexism, homophobia, racism, classism, transphobia, ableism, or any of the other major forms of intersecting oppressions. OMG, THERE ARE SO MANY OTHER PLACES YOU CAN DO THAT!
Also, disagree with me and each other all you like! I love that! If you noticed I said something fucked up about oppression, or if your expertise in your own oppression gives you a better view, and if you are feeling generous enough to share that with me!? I embrace that!
Just be respectful. No name calling, No verbally attacking people. Please, my three readers and twenty-five spambots have feelings too, you know.